AI 编程 3.0 · 值得看 2026-03-17 · 论文

Agentic Reasoning: LLM的智能体推理范式

如何将大型语言模型(LLM)从被动的文本生成器,转变为能够自主规划、行动和学习的智能体? 子问题 环境适应性:如何让LLM在开放、动态的环境中持续交互? 能力进化:如何通过反馈和记忆机制实现自我提升? 协作智能:如何从单智能体扩展到多智能体协作?

打开原文回到归档

来源: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.12538

[2601.12538] Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models

Skip to main content

Learn about arXiv becoming an independent nonprofit.

We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate

> cs > arXiv:2601.12538

Help | Advanced Search

All fields Title Author Abstract Comments Journal reference ACM classification MSC classification Report number arXiv identifier DOI ORCID arXiv author ID Help pages Full text

Search

open search

GO

open navigation menu

quick links

Login Help Pages About

-->

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

arXiv:2601.12538 (cs)[Submitted on 18 Jan 2026] Title:Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models Authors:Tianxin Wei, Ting-Wei Li, Zhining Liu, Xuying Ning, Ze Yang, Jiaru Zou, Zhichen Zeng, Ruizhong Qiu, Xiao Lin, Dongqi Fu, Zihao Li, Mengting Ai, Duo Zhou, Wenxuan Bao, Yunzhe Li, Gaotang Li, Cheng Qian, Yu Wang, Xiangru Tang, Yin Xiao, Liri Fang, Hui Liu, Xianfeng Tang, Yuji Zhang, Chi Wang, Jiaxuan You, Heng Ji, Hanghang Tong, Jingrui He View a PDF of the paper titled Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models, by Tianxin Wei and 28 other authors View PDF

Abstract:Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process underlying inference, problem-solving, and decision-making. While large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities in closed-world settings, they struggle in open-ended and dynamic environments. Agentic reasoning marks a paradigm shift by reframing LLMs as autonomous agents that plan, act, and learn through continual interaction. In this survey, we organize agentic reasoning along three complementary dimensions. First, we characterize environmental dynamics through three layers: foundational agentic reasoning, which establishes core single-agent capabilities including planning, tool use, and search in stable environments; self-evolving agentic reasoning, which studies how agents refine these capabilities through feedback, memory, and adaptation; and collective multi-agent reasoning, which extends intelligence to collaborative settings involving coordination, knowledge sharing, and shared goals. Across these layers, we distinguish in-context reasoning, which scales test-time interaction through structured orchestration, from post-training reasoning, which optimizes behaviors via reinforcement learning and supervised fine-tuning. We further review representative agentic reasoning frameworks across real-world applications and benchmarks, including science, robotics, healthcare, autonomous research, and mathematics. This survey synthesizes agentic reasoning methods into a unified roadmap bridging thought and action, and outlines open challenges and future directions, including personalization, long-horizon interaction, world modeling, scalable multi-agent training, and governance for real-world deployment.

Comments: Project: this https URL

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2601.12538[cs.AI]

  (or arXiv:2601.12538v1[cs.AI] for this version)

  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.12538

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history From: Tianxin Wei[view email][v1] Sun, 18 Jan 2026 18:58:23 UTC (8,703 KB)

Full-text links: Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models, by Tianxin Wei and 28 other authorsView PDFTeX Source

view license

Current browse context: cs.AI

< prev

  |   next >

new | recent | 2026-01

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CL

References & Citations

NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation ×

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

Links to Code Toggle

Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author Venue Institution Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

mathjaxToggle();

About Help

contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact

subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe

Copyright Privacy Policy

Web Accessibility Assistance

arXiv Operational Status